Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO

From: Michael Everson via Unicode <>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:58:09 +0100


You have put words into my mouth. Please don’t. Your description of what I said is NOT accurate.

> On 12 Jun 2018, at 03:53, Marcel Schneider via Unicode <> wrote:
> And in this thread I wanted to demonstrate that by focusing on the wrong priorities, i.e. legacy character names instead of the practicability of on-going encoding and the accurateness of specified decompositions—so that in some instances cedilla was used instead of comma below, Michael pointed out—, ISO/IEC JTC1 SC2/WG2 failed to do its part and missed its mission—and thus didn’t inspire a desire of extensive cooperation (and damaged the reputation of the whole ISO/IEC).
Received on Tue Jun 12 2018 - 09:58:25 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 12 2018 - 09:58:25 CDT