Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

Asmus Freytag wrote,

> ...
> (for an extreme example there's an orthography
> out there that uses @ as a letter -- we know that
> won't work well with email addresses and duplicate
> encoding of the @ shape is a complete non-starter).

Everything's a non-starter.  Until it begins.

It's a non-starter because of the security-sensitive nature of @.

Is this a casing orthography?  (Please see attached image.)

We've seen where typewriter kludges enabled users to represent the glottal stop with a question mark (or a digit seven).  Unicode makes those kludges unnecessary.

But we're still using typewriter kludges to represent stress in Latin script because there is no Unicode plain text solution.