On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 04:52:30 -0800
David Starner via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> Note that this is actually the only thing that stands out to me in
> Unicode not supporting older character sets; in PETSCII (Commodore
> 64), the high-bit character characters were the reverse (in this
> sense) of the low-bit characters.
Later ISCII has some styling codes, bold and italic amongst them.
Richard.
Received on Sat Feb 09 2019 - 08:21:47 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 09 2019 - 08:21:48 CST