Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters

From: John Cowan ([email protected])
Date: Thu Sep 30 1999 - 11:50:42 EDT

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: U+0191, U+0192 [F with hook] (was: Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters)"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Shina (was RE: A basic question on encoding Latin charac"
Maybe in reply to: Marion Gunn: "A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson scripsit:

> 1. Do nothing. Leave it to the font makers to make special fonts for Ewe.

And live with the fact that a single Unicode character is sometimes
alphabetic, sometimes symbolic. Which annoys the makers and users of
tables.

-- 
John Cowan                                   [email protected]
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: U+0191, U+0192 [F with hook] (was: Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters)"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Shina (was RE: A basic question on encoding Latin charac"
Maybe in reply to: Marion Gunn: "A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT