Re: Single Unicode Font

From: Thomas Chan (thomas@atlas.datexx.com)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 12:52:57 EDT

Next message: Ayers, Mike: "RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Single Unicode Font"
In reply to: David Starner: "Re: Single Unicode Font"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Single Unicode Font"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Single Unicode Font"
Reply: David Starner: "Script use by Mathematicians (Was Re: Single Unicode Font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 22 May 2001, David Starner wrote:

> In any case, some scripts just go together. Mathematicians and
> linguists frequently use Latin and Greek together (cf. IPA) in ways
> that require consistent font looks.

Do these need to go together? IPA is Latin, except for a few unfortunate
unifications with Greek.

Thomas Chan
tc31@cornell.edu

Next message: Ayers, Mike: "RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)"
Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Single Unicode Font"
In reply to: David Starner: "Re: Single Unicode Font"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Single Unicode Font"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Single Unicode Font"
Reply: David Starner: "Script use by Mathematicians (Was Re: Single Unicode Font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:18:17 EDT