> On Tuesday, October 16, 2001, at 08:00 PM, James Kass wrote:
>
> > Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs
> > at U+29FD7 and U+29FCE being identical?
> >
[U+29FD7] and [U+29FCE] are not identical. They are (admittedly rather
close) graphical variants. If you want to ID all graphical variants,
you've got a long row to hoe.
For an example of even closer graphical variants (some might even say
*exactly* identical forms), compare [U+20a37] and [U+200ae] ... which I
mentioned to Mr. Jenkins a few weeks ago. As he pointed out, they both
have T-source numbers, and were perhaps deunified because they're
separate in CNS 11643 ...
[U+20a37] and [U+200ae] along with [U+28443], [U+20a31] and [U+20a5f]
are of course all variants of [U+8fb0].
-Richard
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 17 2001 - 15:24:59 EDT