Re: T-->S, S-->T conversions (was RE: A product compatibility question)

• Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "OT Encoding query"
• Next in thread: Jack Halpern: "Re: T-->S, S-->T conversions (was RE: A product compatibility question)"
• Reply: Jack Halpern: "Re: T-->S, S-->T conversions (was RE: A product compatibility question)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Edward Cherlin writes:
> Jack Halpern of the CJK Dictionary Institute explains these issues at
> http://www.cjk.org/cjk/c2c/c2centry.htm. Traditional to Simplified and
> Simplified to Traditional conversions are more complicated than simple
> dictionary lookup. In particular, the conversion is often
> context-dependent. His company offers "Chinese to Chinese" conversion
> software, among other products.

Do be more specific, the software was developed by Basis Technology in
coordination with Jack's organization, which supplied the data.

    -tree

-- 
Tom Emerson                                          Basis Technology Corp.
Sr. Computational Linguist                         http://www.basistech.com
  "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity: lick it once and you suck forever"

• Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "OT Encoding query"
• Next in thread: Jack Halpern: "Re: T-->S, S-->T conversions (was RE: A product compatibility question)"
• Reply: Jack Halpern: "Re: T-->S, S-->T conversions (was RE: A product compatibility question)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Oct 21 2001 - 06:13:42 EDT