Re: (no subject)

From: John Cowan (
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:48:00 EST

  • Next message: William Overington: "Displaying the languages of the Indian subcontinent. (derives from Re: Please see my latest proposal)"

    Mijan scripsit:

    > Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya is
    > displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an
    > instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could also represents
    > ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and have
    > different meaning.

    I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If correct, then
    the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate.

    Dream projects long deferred            John Cowan <>
    usually bite the wax tadpole.  
            --James Lileks        

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 17:34:08 EST