Re: (no subject)

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 18:40:01 EST

  • Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: UTF-8 Error Handling (was: Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review)"

    At 16:48 -0500 2003-03-03, John Cowan wrote:
    >Mijan scripsit:
    >> Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya is
    >> displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an
    >> instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could
    >>also represents
    >> ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and have
    >> different meaning.
    >I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If
    >correct, then
    >the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate.

    ZWJ can be used to produce the required differentiation.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:35:03 EST