From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 18:40:01 EST
At 16:48 -0500 2003-03-03, John Cowan wrote:
>> Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya is
>> displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an
>> instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could
>> ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and have
>> different meaning.
>I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If
>the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate.
ZWJ can be used to produce the required differentiation.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:35:03 EST