From: Christopher John Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:11:32 EST
Michael Everson wrote
> At 16:48 -0500 2003-03-03, John Cowan wrote:
> >Mijan scripsit:
> >> Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya is
> >> displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an
> >> instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could
> >>also represents
> >> ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and have
> >> different meaning.
>
> >I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If
> >correct, then
> >the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate.
> ZWJ can be used to produce the required differentiation.
If this is the way the differentiation should be made there should probably be an explicit note to that effect in the introduction to the Bengali block .
- Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 04 2003 - 01:20:10 EST