Re: ISO 639 "duplicate" codes (was: Re: Ligatures in Turkish and Azeri, was: Accented ij ligatures)

From: Patrick Andries (Patrick.Andries@xcential.com)
Date: Sat Jul 12 2003 - 08:11:42 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Ligatures in Turkish and Azeri, was: Accented ij ligatures"

    Samedi 12 juillet à 6h51, Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net> écrivit :

    > The codes "iw" for Hebrew and "in" for Indonesian were deprecated
    > FOURTEEN YEARS AGO. It is not accurate or fair to refer to them as
    > "duplicates" of "he" and "id". The Registration Authority deprecates
    > such codes, rather than deleting them, for backward compatibility with
    > any data that might contain the old codes.

    Just out of curiosity, why was « iw » deprecated ? Seems perfectly fine to
    me.
    And why was « he » chosen (Herero, Hemba, Hellenic Greek) ?

    P.A.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 12 2003 - 09:01:02 EDT