RE: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676

From: Jony Rosenne (rosennej@qsm.co.il)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 22:59:00 EST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8"

Previous message: Peter Jacobi: "RE: Encoding Tamil SRI"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org
> [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Verdy
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:46 AM
>
> Is there an initiative in Israel related to the supported
> glyphs and rendering features required to support Hebrew,
> like it exists in Europe with MES subsets, and will soon be
> developped for Chinese?
>

Why would we need it? All major vendors support Hebrew quite well now.

Jony

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8"
Previous message: Peter Jacobi: "RE: Encoding Tamil SRI"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 23:42:55 EST