Re: Hexadecimal digits?

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 19:08:07 EST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Hexadecimal digits?"

    On 11/11/2003 13:45, jameskass@att.net wrote:

    >.
    >Peter Kirk wrote,
    >
    >
    >
    >>Jill, I really thought this idea would excite you. Of course it would
    >>have seemed more exciting if you had used a UTF-8 aware mailer (and/or
    >>installed Code2000) ...
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Code2001 is a freeware font which covers Plane One.
    >Code2000 isn't and doesn't.
    >
    >
    >
    Sorry, my mistake, of course I meant Code2001. I presume that is where
    Mozilla found the glyphs. It's amazing what it can find, even Doug's
    private alphabet.

    >>... and not one which somehow converted James' UTF-8
    >>into Mojibake as above.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >This may be the fault of my ISP, the illustrious AT&T's "Webmail".
    >It may not properly tag my outgoing messages as UTF-8. A colleague
    >has written privately to say that it was necessary to manually set
    >the character set to UTF-8 in order for my contrived example to
    >display.
    >
    >
    Yes, it looks like you are right. Mozilla 1.5 autodetected UTF-8. I'm
    surprised Thunderbird, which is basically the same code, didn't do the
    same for Jill.

    -- 
    Peter Kirk
    peter@qaya.org (personal)
    peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
    http://www.qaya.org/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 11 2003 - 19:55:20 EST