Re: New symbols (was Qumran Greek)

• Previous message: D. Starner: "New symbols (was Qumran Greek)"
• In reply to: D. Starner: "New symbols (was Qumran Greek)"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: New symbols (was Qumran Greek)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 14:20 -0800 2003-12-08, D. Starner wrote:

><http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2676.pdf> is a
>complete listing of new symbols to go into Unicode 4.1.
>Remember that it's all still draft; there's a rumor
>going around that Ken Whistler and Michael Everson plan
>to get together after too much eggnog and randomly
>rearrange the numbers.

Who told!??!

>(And even if that's not true, they could.)

Caveat implementor. There ***will*** be changes as a result of
various ballot comments from various countries.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

• Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: New symbols (was Qumran Greek)"
• Previous message: D. Starner: "New symbols (was Qumran Greek)"
• In reply to: D. Starner: "New symbols (was Qumran Greek)"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: New symbols (was Qumran Greek)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 08 2003 - 18:41:09 EST