Re: New symbols (was Qumran Greek)

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Mon Dec 08 2003 - 18:21:04 EST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Coloured diacritics (Was: Transcoding Tamil in the presence of markup)"

    > > Also, where will the new numbers for the accepted TLG
    > > items be posted? Debbie said everything got in, but I
    > > don't know where to find their assigned code points.
    >
    > <http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2676.pdf> is a
    > complete listing of new symbols to go into Unicode 4.1.
    > Remember that it's all still draft;

    And not complete. That is simply the draft for the PDAM
    (preliminary draft amendment) to 10646. It will be subject
    to national ballot comments, which will, no doubt, result
    in further additions, as well as some minor modifications to
    what is currently there. And then it will go to *another*
    round of ballotting after that, the FPDAM ("F" for final),
    where more changes could happen.

    Only after *that* will the UTC feel confident that the
    dust has settled enough to standardize the results as
    Unicode 4.1. Don't be expecting any of this to be
    final this year, or even *next* year. The next character
    additions to the Unicode Standard are likely to be
    published in early 2005.

    > there's a rumor
    > going around that Ken Whistler and Michael Everson plan
    > to get together after too much eggnog and randomly
    > rearrange the numbers. (And even if that's not true,
    > they could.)

    More likely it would be after a few two many
    Guinesses.

    --Ken



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 08 2003 - 18:53:34 EST