From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Tue Dec 16 2003 - 10:51:00 EST
Stefan Persson writes:
> Isn't the sequence "dotless i + combining acute" canonically equivalent
> to "dotted i + combining acute"?
NO. There's no canonical equivalence between distinct pairs of characters,
if the first letter of each pair are not also canonically equivalent.
__________________________________________________________________
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside
Newsletters for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 16 2003 - 11:40:43 EST