From: Chris Jacobs (chris.jacobs@freeler.nl)
Date: Tue Dec 16 2003 - 14:30:42 EST
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe Verdy" <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>
To: "Unicode Mailing List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters
> Stefan Persson writes:
> > Isn't the sequence "dotless i + combining acute" canonically equivalent
> > to "dotted i + combining acute"?
>
> NO. There's no canonical equivalence between distinct pairs of characters,
> if the first letter of each pair are not also canonically equivalent.
compare ę̈ with ę̈
The first pair has e trema as its first letter, the second pair e ogonek.
Yet these pairs are canonical equivalent.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 16 2003 - 15:34:31 EST