From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Dec 16 2003 - 15:00:56 EST
At 20:30 +0100 2003-12-16, Chris Jacobs wrote:
> > NO. There's no canonical equivalence between distinct pairs of characters,
>> if the first letter of each pair are not also canonically equivalent.
>
>compare ëœ with ´¨
>
>The first pair has e trema as its first letter, the second pair e ogonek.
>Yet these pairs are canonical equivalent.
The base letter is "e"
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 16 2003 - 16:01:52 EST