RE: Aramaic unification and information retrieval

From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Tue Dec 23 2003 - 19:40:03 EST

  • Next message: John Hudson: "RE: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"

    Michael Everson wrote:
    > Of course, to echo the observation John Hudson made regarding the
    > Masonic Hebrew and Samaritan text, the text presented here
    > http://www.crowndiamond.org/cd/genesis.html shows that Palaeo-Hebrew
    > should obviously unified with Latin.

    Instead of taking dogmatic positions on how proto-semitics scripts
    should be encoded, why not leaving this work to the people that
    will really use these scripts and are currently working with
    those texts and publishing them? It seems that there are much
    enough people working there without needing to oppose to all
    what they have to say.

    Could you instead take the time to work on the missing Latin
    letters for African languages? Why isn't there any serious
    work about these living languages that don't have lot of
    universitary support and nearly no computer resources in
    Africa to make this job?

    There are lots of work there to work with specifications,
    work with simple 8-bit encodings that could be mapped easily to
    Unicode and usable on low-cost computers, and some agreements
    to seek with these African communities so that they will finally
    get keyboards, fonts and applications that will fit their urgent
    need for litteracy support in poor country (producing books for
    these languages is too much expensive in those poor countries,
    and they need a way to automate this to allow developping
    education in those countries, as well as acess to culture
    in their language, with translations of their work).

    These millions of African people merit respect even if their
    culture is not aided by their government which sometimes refuses
    any help to develop native languages face to official ones (like
    French, English, Arabic).

    You get people learn happily other cultures if they are not
    offered first the legitimate right to learn and use their own
    culture, i.e. their native languages and scripts.

    In many cases, African languages would be better served if the
    Latin characters needed for their languages were added and
    specified in accurate lists, so that systems could be developped
    to use and interchange these languages, and fonts could be
    augmented by typographers like you with the support of the missing
    few glyphs.

    There is still interesting work to do within the Latin and
    Arabic scripts. It's a shame that someone like you invest so
    much in an area that would better be specified by other
    communities. You can keep your right of criticizing their
    work, or specify some formalism if you need it. But please avoid
    dogmatic attitutes, simply because people in this list do not
    have the same formalism as the one you created.

    Thanks.
    Philippe.

    __________________________________________________________________
    << ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside
    Newsletters for me
    You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 23 2003 - 20:11:47 EST