Re: why Aramaic now

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Dec 24 2003 - 15:18:35 EST

  • Next message: Elaine Keown: "RE: [hebrew] Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval"

    At 12:02 -0800 2003-12-24, Elaine Keown wrote:

    >Some of the sets of symbols I found---which I simply assumed could
    >be added to "Hebrew"--are innately controversial because of the
    >Roadmap.

    Innately?

    >That's actually true for 3 subsets of symbols that I think of as
    >"Extended Hebrew."

    Try thinking of them as General RTL Punctuation.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 24 2003 - 15:45:08 EST