Re: Aramaic unification and information retrieval

From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Thu Dec 25 2003 - 05:36:00 EST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "A definition for orthograph ?"

    D. Starner wrote:
    > Philippe Verdy wrote:
    > > The absence of consensus for the orthograph is not a good reason,
    >
    > A standard that will serve forever shouldn't be encoding drafts that
    > will change tomorrow or next month and no one will actually use.
    > Unicode should only encode characters that have actually seen use,
    > not that might see use.

    I said "orthograph", not "letters".

    The characters in question are already in use in printed books and
    various online publications or handwritten and artistic forms, even if
    the orthograph is not fixed.

    In fact the orthograph is probably not fixed in any language, and it
    evolves over time by admitting common spelling errors...



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 25 2003 - 06:22:58 EST