Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 12:52:09 EST
Curtis Clark wrote,
> on 2004-03-18 01:05 Pavel Adamek wrote:
> > So it would be convenient to have an empty diacritical mark,
> > (COMBINING NOTHING ABOVE)
> > which would cause the "soft" dot of <j> or <i> to disappear,
> > without adding anything else.
> Assuming this could be added to any other character, my mind boggles at
> the implications, both for decomposition and for rendering. :-)
The glyph could look like the old Pac-Man video game. It should remain
visible until it has consumed the applicable diacritic, then vanish.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 18 2004 - 13:23:51 EST