From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:56:31 EST
At 17:33 -0500 2004-03-18, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote:
>You might say, then why not introduce a "seimhiu" character whose glyphic
>representation is either h-following or dot-above? Primarily for Unicode
>structural reasons: Unicode needs to say a character is either combining or
>not.
I proposed one once, long ago. When I didn't know anything about
Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:34:48 EST