Re: [OT] Freedom and organization (was RE: help needed with adding ne w character)

• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Irish dotless I (was: Languages with letters that always take diacriticals"
• In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "[OT] Freedom and organization (was RE: help needed with adding ne w character)"
• Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: [OT] Freedom and organization (was RE: help needed with adding ne w character)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

(perhaps ever so slightly closer to on-topic)...

Marco Cimarosti wrote:

>Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>
>
>>Why is an Anarchist asking to standardize something?
>>
>>
>
>Why not!? Can you elaborate on this? Myself, I am an anarchist sympathizer,
>and I have been deeply interested in a character encoding standard for
>nearly ten years now...
>
And moreover, what difference does it make? What do the goals, real or
perceived, of the group using the symbol have to do with its worthiness
to be encoded? So long as it *is* in fact actually being used in a
Unicode-worthy way, isn't that what matters?

~mark

• Next message: brian@gael-image.com: "Re: Irish dotless I"
• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Irish dotless I (was: Languages with letters that always take diacriticals"
• In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "[OT] Freedom and organization (was RE: help needed with adding ne w character)"
• Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: [OT] Freedom and organization (was RE: help needed with adding ne w character)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:36:53 EST