Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants

From: Marion Gunn ([email protected])
Date: Wed Sep 01 2004 - 03:52:58 CDT

Next message: Martine Brunet: "Unicode V4 and ISO"

Previous message: [email protected]: "Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
In reply to: [email protected]: "Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Reply: [email protected]: "Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The expression 'glyph variants' would be more common, I believe. mg

[email protected] wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> What is the preferred terminology in the Unicode context: "glyph
> variants" or "glyphic variants"? Both exist in real-life documents.
>
> Thanks in advance for any views on this!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc Küster

-- 
Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991)
27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an 
Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire.
* [email protected] * [email protected] *

Next message: Martine Brunet: "Unicode V4 and ISO"
Previous message: [email protected]: "Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
In reply to: [email protected]: "Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Reply: [email protected]: "Re: Glyph variants vs. glyphic variants"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 01 2004 - 11:45:18 CDT