Re: Unicode Stability (Was: Re: E0000 Language Tags for Some Obscure Languages)

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 10:44:36 CST

  • Next message: UList@dfa-mail.com: "But E0000 Custom Language Tags Are Actually *Required* For Use By Unicode"

    Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote:

    > On 02/03/2005 11:18, Michael Everson wrote:
    >
    >> ...
    >> I make additions to Unicode all the time.
    >
    > I trust you mean that you propose additional characters to Unicode,
    > and after careful consideration some of them are accepted by the
    > relevant committees, the UTC and WG2, and accepted by a vote of
    > national standards bodies. (Some changes to Unicode properties etc are
    > decided by the UTC alone, but not new characters.) No additions to
    > Unicode are made until this process is complete.

    He knows this. It's shorthand in speech.

    -Doug Ewell
     Fullerton, California
     http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 02 2005 - 10:46:26 CST