Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Sun Mar 06 2005 - 18:43:04 CST

Next message: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"

Previous message: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
In reply to: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Next in thread: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Reply: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"vlad" <emperor dot vlad at gmail dot com> wrote:

> Couldn't the automatic ligation of fi be prevented in Turkish/Azeri by
> encoding their dotted i as i + COMBINING DOT ABOVE, rather than i
> alone?

It could, but that's not what the character is.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Previous message: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
In reply to: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Next in thread: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Reply: vlad: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 06 2005 - 18:48:09 CST