From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Sat Apr 16 2005 - 04:10:24 CST
On 15/04/2005 01:41, John Hudson wrote:
> Peter Kirk wrote:
>
>> But I thought Ken had just told us that error reports on character
>> names made through these channels would be ignored. In fact Ken's
>> words were:
>>
>>> ... both committees to decide that past a certain point
>>> such defect reports would be noted but not acted upon, insofar
>>> as they were requests for changes in names of published characters
>>> in the standards.
>>
>
> *insofar as they were requests for changes in names of published
> characters in the standards*
>
> In other words, error reports requesting e.g. annotations to the
> standard may be acted upon since they do not involve changes to names.
>
Of course. And, despite what Otto claimed afterwards, the context was
clearly "official Unicode Character Names ... collecting evidence for
the error or suggested amendmend, ... wording a correction".
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 16 2005 - 05:16:11 CST