Re: U+01B5/01B6

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Sat May 14 2005 - 03:32:47 CDT

Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Cyrillic guillemotleft and guillemotright"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Cyrillic guillemotleft and guillemotright"
In reply to: Adam Twardoch: "U+01B5/01B6"
Next in thread: Charles: "Re: U+01B5/01B6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 00:56 +0200 2005-05-14, Adam Twardoch wrote:

>In Polish, a glyph like that is used as a stylistic
>variant/alternate rendition of z with dot above (U+017B/017C), but
>not as a separate character. In what context is it used as a
>separate character?

Pan-Turkic orthography.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Cyrillic guillemotleft and guillemotright"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Cyrillic guillemotleft and guillemotright"
In reply to: Adam Twardoch: "U+01B5/01B6"
Next in thread: Charles: "Re: U+01B5/01B6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 14 2005 - 03:42:37 CDT