Re: Corrections to Glagolitic

From: Alexander Kh. (
Date: Tue May 17 2005 - 00:07:34 CDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Corrections to Glagolitic"


    Kenneth Whistler wrote:
    > What *that* means is that discussion of the formal character
    > names is academic at this point -- they are no longer proposals,
    > but are published and immutable.

    When the Unicode standard becomes too "academic", it is never too
    early or too late to create a new precise standard. I suppose I am
    talking to an old man who does not believe that he will outlive the
    current "immutable" standard.

    Best Regards!


    Sign-up for Ads Free at

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 17 2005 - 00:08:49 CDT