From: Peter Constable ([email protected])
Date: Mon Jul 11 2005 - 13:29:23 CDT
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On
> Behalf Of Gregg Reynolds
> There would be various ways of doing this, but the way that is easiest
> on the proofreader is to have some kind of graphical variance the
> indicates the underlying structure. I.e. a transparent font.
Um... the way that would be easiest on the proofreader is to use an
automated process, such as a tool that took an inventory of encoded
characters, or a spelling checker.
Peter Constable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 11 2005 - 15:03:14 CDT