RE: Proofreading fonts

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Mon Jul 11 2005 - 13:29:23 CDT

  • Next message: Mark Davis: "Re: CLDR plural handling info?"

    > From: []
    > Behalf Of Gregg Reynolds

    > There would be various ways of doing this, but the way that is easiest
    > on the proofreader is to have some kind of graphical variance the
    > indicates the underlying structure. I.e. a transparent font.

    Um... the way that would be easiest on the proofreader is to use an
    automated process, such as a tool that took an inventory of encoded
    characters, or a spelling checker.

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 11 2005 - 15:03:14 CDT