From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat May 05 2007 - 07:11:26 CST
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Frank Ellermann
> ... SZlig is still no new character.
Shall we say that sz-lig is not a character? Clearly it's too late for that. The question before us is, given that sz-lig *is* encoded as a character, what is the best encoded representation for the typeform in question, "SZ-lig" (as you refer to it)?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 05 2007 - 07:13:11 CST