Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages

Date: Fri Oct 26 2007 - 11:13:51 CDT

  • Next message: Marion Gunn: "Re: Use of acronyms (was RE:"

    Quoting Mike <>:

    >> I am certain that what was meant was, "If the allocation of CJKV
    >> code points continues to be done in this way, then modern CJKV
    >> coverage will require not only BMP and plane 2 support but also, in
    >> the future, plane 3 support."
    > I'm uncertain as to what the problem being discussed is. Once you have
    > support for plane 2, you automatically support plane 3 (and planes 4, 5,
    > 6, etc.) at least from an encoding perspective (UTF-xx). What am I
    > missing?
    > Mike

    Application wide nothing, this is more emphasis than anything else.


    This message sent through Virus Free Email

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 26 2007 - 11:16:17 CDT