RE: Dotless J with stroke.

From: Peter Constable ([email protected])
Date: Tue Dec 11 2007 - 20:49:56 CST

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Dotless J with stroke."

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Dotless J with stroke."
In reply to: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Dotless J with stroke."
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Dotless J with stroke."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Kent Karlsson

> So I would conclude that an esh-like or turned f-like glyph would just
> be approximants,

These would be a fricative and a plosive respectively, not approximants. ;-)

Peter

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Dotless J with stroke."
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Dotless J with stroke."
In reply to: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Dotless J with stroke."
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Dotless J with stroke."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 11 2007 - 20:52:11 CST