- Previous message: Karl Pentzlin: "i with macron over an e - Do U+0365 and U+2071 lose their dot when accented like U+0069?"
- Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
- Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
If a nonspacing mark (diacritic) below a modified letter (with raised
appearance) is applied, can it be expected to be applied to the
bottom of the modifier letter (instead of below the baseline), as long
as the font or rendering is "smart" enough to place nonspacing marks
according to Unicode rules?
Is it sufficient to encode the entity marked in red in the attached scan
(showing a modifier letter alpha with dot below) as U+1D45 U+0323?
(The scan is from:
Hotzenköcherle, Rudolf
Einführung in den Sprachatlas der Deutschen Schweiz
Einführungsband B
Bern [Switzerland] 1962, p.84)
- Karl Pentzlin
- Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
- Previous message: Karl Pentzlin: "i with macron over an e - Do U+0365 and U+2071 lose their dot when accented like U+0069?"
- Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
- Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 22 2008 - 18:31:03 CST