From: Christoph Päper (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 19 2011 - 09:48:00 CDT
> Ogham is today, as it has always been, intrinisically a vertical bottom-to-top script.
Such assumed intrinsics are often not monocausal. In this case, for instance, not only the script but also the writing surface matters.
> Manuscript scribes and computer fontmakers (for their own convenience), may write it left-to-right.
Exactly. Ogham can safely be assumed to be a script with rightwards (dextrograde) character progression and downwards line progression for the use-cases Fantasai is concerned with. And for Unicode, too.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 19 2011 - 09:52:28 CDT