Re: Noto unified font

From: Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 13:28:55 +0200

2016-10-09 8:17 GMT+02:00 Luke Dashjr <luke_at_dashjr.org>:

> On Sunday, October 09, 2016 4:37:24 AM Philippe Verdy wrote:
> > The licence itself says it respects the 4 FSF freedoms. It also
> explicitly
> > allows reselling (rule DFSG #1):
> > http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL
>
> No, it doesn't. That link is just a commentary, and of no relevance to non-
> SIL-owned fonts.
>

The link is the one directly used on the Noto description page when it
refers to the OFL licence. It is not saying that it is only for SIL-owned
fonts. Google/Monotype would have linked to another page if needed but this
is the most relevant one explicitly stated by Google on the Noto site.
Received on Sun Oct 09 2016 - 06:29:38 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 09 2016 - 06:29:39 CDT