Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)

From: Rebecca Bettencourt via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:20:48 -0700

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:53 PM, James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org
> wrote:

> Blissymbolics, as pointed out
> by Leo Broukhis, might be good candidates for "emojification".
>

Why don't we just get Blissymbolics encoded as it is?
Received on Mon Aug 20 2018 - 22:21:17 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: William_J_G Overington via Unicode: "Re: Private Use areas (was: Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was ...))"
Previous message: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: Tales from the Archives"
In reply to: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)"
Next in thread: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)"
Reply: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 20 2018 - 22:21:17 CDT