> I doubt it. Moreover, JPEG is a bad choice for that purpose. GIF
> or PNG is much better. You can see my point if you compare the size of
> JPEG and GIF/PNG files for the same glyph. Generally, the size INCREASE
> when you convert GIF/PNG files mainly made of line elements to JPEG.
>
> Jungshik Shin
I agree, my mistake to mention JPEG for this purpose, GIF is better,
when using PNG, be aware that many older browsers (like Netscape 3.0
I'm using here, and cannot upgrade, because of a company decision)
do not support PNG. I can't even view most exotic variants of JPEG
here...
Jeroen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:40 EDT