John Cowan said:
> Until I heard about the SMALL G WITH CEDILLA case, it would never have occurred
> to me that a CEDILLA could sometimes be represented by a glyph *above* the base
Yup, me neither. I guess I didn't see this in all these years of staring at
Can someone explain the rationale? Or at least, explain it in the book.
And I think John's "Canonical Interferometry" reading is essentially correct...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:42 EDT