Re: What happened to ....?

From: Ashley Yakeley (
Date: Wed Dec 01 1999 - 03:38:43 EST

At 1999-11-30 22:57, Edward Cherlin wrote:

>Yes, indeed, we had this discussion before.

Mark's actually replying to quite an old message of mine... but perhaps
you've had the discussion before that, too.

>The conclusion :-) :-) is
>that (The Artist Who Should Now Be Known as What's-'Is-Name[1])'s
>pronunciationless name glyph is an idiosyncratic, personal, novel,
>rarely exchanged, private-use logo and graphic, and as such is not
>eligible (on seven separate counts) for inclusion in Unicode.

Perhaps it could be faked with symbols and combining marks...

Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
Almost empty page: <>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:56 EDT