Re: Unicode Cyrillic GHE DE PE TE in Serbian

From: John Jenkins (jenkins@apple.com)
Date: Wed Jan 05 2000 - 12:17:51 EST


on 1/4/00 9:18 PM, Tiro Typeworks at tiro@tiro.com wrote:

>
> Is it the case, though, that _all_ simplified hanzi have separate
> codepoints from their traditional forms?
>

No. The PRC muddied the water with regards specifically to GB7590-87. The
standard as most people have copies contains simplified characters, but the
version submitted to the IRG for the unification work has traditional
characters. The net effect is that these characters (presumably) could be
used in either their traditional or simplified forms interchangeably.
Maybe.

=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com
tseng@blueneptune.com
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT