I think Jim meant "using the PUA for presentation form glyphs",
and I think he's write that the basic premise of Unicode is to
provide interchangeable encoding of characters (rather than
From: <email@example.com> AT Internet on 02/23/2000 06:08 AM
Received on: 02/23/2000
To: Peter Constable/IntlAdmin/WCT, <firstname.lastname@example.org> AT
cc: <email@example.com> AT Internet@Ccmail
Subject: Re: PUA
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com wrote:
> James E. Agenbroad wrote:
> >Using the PUA for glyphs sems contrary to the our basic
> Wait. What premises? Who is "we"?
> >but can we prevent consenting users from doing so?
> Ciao. Marco
23, 2000 The 'premise' is for efficient communication among
computers one assigns codes to characters, not glyphs; 'we' is
the authors and users of Unicode. Did I get this wrong?
Jim Agenbroad ( jage@LOC.gov )
The above are purely personal opinions, not necessarily
the official views of any government or any agency of any.
Phone: 202 707-9612; Fax: 202 707-0955; US mail: I.T.S.
Dev.Gp.4, Library of Congress, 101 Independence Ave. SE,
Washington, D.C. 20540-9334 U.S.A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT