Timothy Partridge <timpart@perdix.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> The following bit pattern is not Latin-* (but could be a control code):
> 100xxxxx
This is true, and works fine if you are trying to detect true Latin-1.
However, sometimes "Windows-1252" is meant when "Latin-1" is said, and
then the test does not hold true.
In Windows-1252, only 0x81, 0x8D, 0x8F, 0x90, and 0x9D are undefined.
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:04 EDT