Re: Signature for SCSU

From: Markus Scherer (
Date: Thu Jul 20 2000 - 18:44:35 EDT

David Starner wrote:
> I'm implementing SCSU, and I was curious about the signature for SCSU. The
> UTR specifies 10 different signatures and then labels 0E FE FF as recommended.
> Is it acceptable for a decoder to interpret an initial 0E FE FF as the
> signature and decode the others as ZWNBSP,

yes, that is the idea.

> or must it interpret all of them
> as signatures?


i am curious as to which product or application you are implementing scsu for. can you tell us/me, please?


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT