Latvian palatalised consonants

From: Herman Ranes (herman@iet.hist.no)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 07:16:14 EDT

Is the use of the existing precomposed characters in the Latin
Extended-A block considered 'right' for encoding Latvian palatal
consonants, or is it considered 'wrong' so that I will have to use
composites with U+0326 'Combining comma below' in stead?

I am aware that many use those percomposed cedilla-characters, but
nevertheless it does not look Latvian to me...

Romanian did get its precomposed letters - can one expect any
precendence with regard to Latvian?

:-) 

--
Herman Ranes                  Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag
                              Avdeling for teknologi
Telefon   +47 73559606        Institutt for elektroteknikk
Telefaks  +47 73559581
<herman@iet.hist.no>          N-7004 Trondheim
http://www.hist.no/~herman/   NOREG

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:14 EDT