Is the use of the existing precomposed characters in the Latin
Extended-A block considered 'right' for encoding Latvian palatal
consonants, or is it considered 'wrong' so that I will have to use
composites with U+0326 'Combining comma below' in stead?
I am aware that many use those percomposed cedilla-characters, but
nevertheless it does not look Latvian to me...
Romanian did get its precomposed letters - can one expect any
precendence with regard to Latvian?
-- Herman Ranes Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag Avdeling for teknologi Telefon +47 73559606 Institutt for elektroteknikk Telefaks +47 73559581 <firstname.lastname@example.org> N-7004 Trondheim http://www.hist.no/~herman/ NOREG
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:14 EDT