Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Mon Nov 20 2000 - 11:14:29 EST

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "[totally OT] Unicode terminology (was Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode])"
Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]"
Maybe in reply to: addison@inter-locale.com: "string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]"
Next in thread: addison@inter-locale.com: "Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

David Starner wrote:
> I chose Astral Planes for perceived grace
> and beauty.

Thank you!

-- 
There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "[totally OT] Unicode terminology (was Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode])"
Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]"
Maybe in reply to: addison@inter-locale.com: "string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]"
Next in thread: addison@inter-locale.com: "Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:15 EDT