Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?

From: Alain LaBonté (alb@riq.qc.ca)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:37:13 EST

Next message: Elaine Keown: "boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
Previous message: Tex Texin: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
In reply to: Tex Texin: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

À 15:26 2000-12-20 -0500, Tex Texin a écrit:
>Alain,
>ok, but why is this pertinent to this list and what is it you
>are asking Unicode to do or stop doing?

I answered this at 15:12 but you probably did not see it yet.

Alain

Next message: Elaine Keown: "boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
Previous message: Tex Texin: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
In reply to: Tex Texin: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:17 EDT