boustrophedon more current, not ancient?
From: Elaine Keown (keown@altavista.com)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 15:49:09 EST
- Next message: John Cowan: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
- Previous message: Alain LaBonté : "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
- Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Rick McGowan: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Peck, Jon: "RE: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: John Jenkins: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Robin Cover: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: John Hudson: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Robin Cover: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Hello,
I studied Chinese in "horizontal, left to right mode" in Boston, but my impression is that Chinese and Japanese newspapers are still mostly written in a vertical, frequently right-to-left, boustrophedon. I know nothing whatsoever about Korean. But, of course, I am not using the word 'boustrophedon' in its usual way, to refer to text placement in script-based languages, where the script runs continuously first left-to-right and then, zipping backwards like a good fast printer, right-to-left.
Literally 'boustrophedon' refers to how an ox plows a field.
So I'm not sure if the quote below is completely accurate.........
> "Boustrophedon writing is of interest almost exclusively to scholars
> intent on reproducing the exact visual content of ancient texts. The
Elaine Keown
Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com
- Next message: John Cowan: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
- Previous message: Alain LaBonté : "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
- Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Rick McGowan: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Peck, Jon: "RE: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: John Jenkins: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Michael Everson: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Robin Cover: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: John Hudson: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Maybe reply: Robin Cover: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2
: Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:17 EDT