Kenneth Whistler wrote,
> Please note that both the UTC and WG2 have approved a new set
> of combining double accents:
> U+035D COMBINING DOUBLE BREVE
> U+035E COMBINING DOUBLE MACRON
> U+035F COMBINING DOUBLE LOW LINE
> Now, the question is, how long will it take for the fonts and
> browsers to catch up on those forms, as well??
The other double combiner marks already work fairly well in default
position in existing browsers. These ought to work right out-of-the-
box, once fonts include glyphs.
Is it safe to include glyphs for the above referenced characters now?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Aug 12 2002 - 19:33:17 EDT